Is there no bottom to the SPAC mess?

Startups

For a brief moment earlier in the ongoing pandemic, it appeared that there was a solution for the backlog of richly priced startups that needed to provide their backers with liquidity: SPACs.

SPACs, or special purpose acquisition companies, are paper companies taken public with capital attached that then combine with a private entity, effectively bootstrapping startups onto the public markets.

That SPACs have a colorful history is to understate the case. But in 2020 to 2021, with startup capital flowing and high-profile backers aboard, some hoped that blank-check companies would rescue unicorns from private-market illiquidity. It was not to be. Some startups did go public via a SPAC, yes, but few brand-name unicorns, and in many cases, the blank-check debuts resulted in value incineration. Or worse.


The Exchange explores startups, markets and money.

Read it every morning on TechCrunch+ or get The Exchange newsletter every Saturday.


Recent news — from Bird’s potential delisting and the BuzzFeed employee lawsuit to the latest from Latch (more on that shortly) — has us wondering whether there really is a bottom to the mess that SPAC-led debuts left all over the public markets. Then we want to know who is to blame. Thankfully, we have receipts.

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

Shein must cede Indians’ data, control of local ops to re-enter India
TuSimple’s former CEO wants a new board that will liquidate the company
Amazon Fire TV introduces ‘Dual Audio’ feature for simultaneous listening via hearing aids and TV speakers
The DOJ wants a Perplexity executive to testify in its Google antitrust case
Focused Energy buys two of the world’s most powerful lasers for its fusion quest

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *